EU362014

ID

A737841CB066400DADB068A28E69AC99

文件大小(MB)

0.73

页数:

41

文件格式:

pdf

日期:

2014-9-12

购买:

购买或下载

文本摘录(文本识别可能有误,但文件阅览显示及打印正常,pdf文件可进行文字搜索定位):

II,(Non-legislative acts),REGULATIONS,COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 36/2014,of 16 January 2014,amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for aminopyralid, chlorantraniliprole, cyflufenamid, mepiquat, metalaxyl-M, propamocarb, pyriofenone and quinoxyfen in or on certain products,(Text with EEA relevance),THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC ( 1 ), and in particular Article 14(1)(a) thereof,Whereas:,(1) Annex II and Part B of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 set the maximum residue levels (MRLs) for metalaxyl-M and quinoxyfen and Part A of Annex III to that Regulation sets the MRLs for aminopyralid, chlorantraniliprole, cyflufenamid, mepiquat, pencycuron and propamocarb. As regards pyriofenone, no specific MRLs were set nor was the substance included in Annex IV to that Regulation, so the default value of 0.01 mg/kg applies.,(2) In the context of a procedure for the authorisation of the use of a plant protection product containing the active substance chlorantraniliprole on beetroot, carrots, celeriac, horseradish, Jerusalem artichokes, parsnips, parsley root, salsify, swedes, turnips and other root and tuber vegetables (except sugar beet and radishes), an application was submitted in accordance with Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 for modification of the existing MRLs.,(3) Such applications were also submitted as regards cyflufenamid for pome fruits (except apples and pears), gherkins and cucurbits with inedible peel (except melons); as regards mepiquat for oats, wheat and products of animal origin considering residue levels in feed items resulting from the uses of mepiquat on wheat, rye and barley; as regards metalaxyl-M for currants; as regards pencycuron for potatoes; as regards propamocarb for rocket and leek; and as regards pyriofenone for table and wine grapes, barley, oats, rye and wheat.,(4) In accordance with paragraphs 2 and 4 of Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 an application was submitted for aminopyralid in products of animal origin considering residue levels in feed items resulting from the use of aminopyralid on grass pasture. The applicant claims that the authorised use of aminopyralid on grass pasture in the United States, Canada, Bolivia, Argentina and Brazil leads to residues exceeding the MRLs authorised under Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 and that higher MRLs are necessary to avoid trade barriers for the importation of products of animal origin.,(5) Such applications were also submitted as regards chlorantraniliprole for oilseeds (except peanuts, soya beans and cotton seeds) and as regards quinoxyfen for hops. In both cases the applicants claim that the authorised use of the substances on those crops in the United States leads to residues exceeding the MRLs authorised under Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 and that higher MRLs are necessary to avoid trade barriers for the importation of oilseeds.EN 21.1.2014 Official Journal of the European Union L 17/1,( 1 ) OJ L 70, 16.3.2005, p. 1.,(6) In accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 those applications were evaluated by the Member States concerned and the evaluation reports were forwarded to the Commission.,(7) The European Food Safety Authority ("the Authority") assessed the applications and the evaluation reports, examining in particular the risks to the consumer and, where relevant, to animals and gave reasoned opinions on the proposed MRLs ( 1 ). It forwarded those opinions to the Commission and the Member States and made them available to the public.,(8) The Authority concluded that, as regards the use of aminopyralid on grass pasture, no modification of the existing MRLs is required for milk, eggs, poultry and swine products. As regards the use of chlorantraniliprole on oilseeds and the use of pencycuron on potatoes, it concluded that the submitted data are not sufficient to set a new MRL. As regards the use of propamocarb on leek, the Authority does not recommend setting the proposed MRL since a risk for consumers cannot be excluded. Moreover, the intended drench application is not supported by data. The existing MRLs should therefore remain unchanged.,(9) As regards all other applications, the Authority concluded that all requirements with respect to data were met and that ……

……